Verified CTAL-TAE dumps Q&As 100% Pass in First Attempt Guaranteed Updated Dump from ValidExam [Q22-Q40]

admin CTAL-TAE ISQI October 27, 2022

4/5 - (2 votes)

Verified CTAL-TAE dumps Q&As 100% Pass in First Attempt Guaranteed Updated Dump from ValidExam

Pass iSQI Advanced Level Test Automation Engineer CTAL-TAE Exam With 41 Questions

NEW QUESTION 22
You are working on a TAS for standalone application. The automated tests are developed based on a automation framework that allows interaction with GUI elements using on object orientated API. The GUI elements include menus, buttons, radio buttons, text toolbars and their properties.
Whilst automating a test, you have discovered that the GUI elements of some third party components are not identifiable by the automated tool you are using.
Which of the following is the FIRST stepthat you take to investigate this issue?

Verify the testability support with the providers of the third party components

Verify whether the GUI identification depends on the browser.

Adopt an approach that uses the coordinates of the GUI elementsinstead

Verify whether naming standards for variables and have been defined for the current automation solution

NEW QUESTION 23
Which of the following attributes should NOT be included in a test execution report associated with a suite of automated tests?

Summary of the test execution results

System/Application under test and its version

Defect clusters identified during test execution

Environment in which the tests have been executed

NEW QUESTION 24
Which of the following statements about the reuse of TAS artefacts is TRUE?

Reusable TAS artefacts can include components (or parts of components) associated with different layers of the TAA

To enable reuse of TAS artefacts, a good design for reuse is built into the TAA and to further action are needed during the TAS lifecycle

Communications maintenance and improvements for reusing TAS artefacts are modifyaddressed during the design of the TAA

Reusable TAS artifacts associated with the definition layer of the TAA include the adaptors to the SUT components and/or interfaces

NEW QUESTION 25
Consider a TAS that exclusively uses the APIs of a SUT. To make this work, significant changes have been required to the SUT by adding a set of dedicated test interfaces to the APIs. All the automated tests will use these test interfaces when interacting with the SUT. Assume that you are currently verifying the correctness of the automated test environment and test tool setup.
Which of the following would you expect to be the MOST specific risk associated with this scenario?

The connectivity from the TAS to the dedicated test interfaces will not work

The process of configuring the TAS will be error-phone due to manual intervention

The automated test cases will not contain the expected result

False alarms, that are unlikely to occur in the real world, will be observed during testing

NEW QUESTION 26
Consider a SUT that small run on multiple platform during the execution of automated test runs. In each test run an automated test suite needs to be executed, with the same version of the TAF, against the same version of the SUT of each platform. Each platform shall have its own dedicated test environment. Your goal is to implement a process as automated as possible ( i.e with minimal manual intervention) that allows implementing a consistent setup of the TAS across the multiple test environments.
Which two of the following aspects are MOST relevant for achieving your goal in this scenario?
* The configuration of the TAS uses automated installation scripts
* The TAF saves the logs needed to debug errors in XML format
C)Features of the TAF not used by the automated tests have been tested
D)All the automated test cases contain the expected results
E)The TAS components are under configuration management

A and e

B and c

B and d

A and d

NEW QUESTION 27
Consider a TAS associated to dynamically changing software frequent releases. Your goal is to determine the amount of effort required to maintain the automated tests of the regression test suite for each new release of the SUT.
What is the MOST important metric to collect to achieve your goal?

The code coverage achieved with the automated tests, for each new release of the SUT

The number of automated tests which fail because of a single software defect, for each new release of the SUT

The time it takes to execute all the automated tests, for each new release of the SUT.

The number of automated tests requiring maintenance, for each new release of the SUT.

NEW QUESTION 28
You are executing the first test run of a test automation suite of 200 tests. All the relevant information related to the state of the SUT and to the automated test execution is stored in a small database. During the Automated test run you observe that the first 10 test pass, while an abnormal termination occurs when executing the
11thtest. This test does not complete its execution and the overall execution of the suite is aborted. An immediate analysis of the abnormal termination is expected to be time consuming and you have been asked to produce a detailed report of the execution results for the first test run, as soon as possible.
What is the MOST important FIRST step to be taken immediately after the abnormal occurred when executing the 11thtest?

Re-run the test automation suite starting from the 12thtest

Return the database to a consistent state that allows subsequent test to run

Take a backup of the database in its current state. So It can be analyzed later

Re-run the test automation suite starting from the 1sttest.

NEW QUESTION 29
Consider a TAS that uses a keyword-driven framework. The SUT is a web application and there is a large set of keywords available for writing the automated tests that relate to highly specific user actions linked directly to the GUI of the SUT. The automated test written with the keywords are statically analyzed by a custom tool which highlight’s repeated instances of identical sequence of keywords. The waiting mechanism implemented by the TAS for a webpage load is based on a synchronous sampling within a given timeout. The TAS allowschecking a webpage load everyseconds until a timeout value

Changing the scripting approach to data-driven scripting

Implementing keywords with a higher level of granularity

Changing the wait mechanism to explicit hard-coded waits

Establishing an error recovery process for TAS and SUT

NEW QUESTION 30
Which of the following statement about the implementation of automated regression testing is FALSE?

When automating regression tests, the structure of automated tests mustalways be the same as the corresponding manual tests

When automating regression tests, the corresponding manual tests should have already been executed to verify they operate correctly

When automating regression tests, theinitialization steps set the test preconditions should be automated wherever possible

When automating regression tests, consideration should be given to how much time would be saved by automation

NEW QUESTION 31
A web application was released into production one year ago, it has regular release which follow a V-model lifecycle and testing is well-established and fully integration into the development lifecycle. You have beenasked to implement a TAS for the regression test suite. The regression tests have been developed via the GUI and are expected to be run at least four times a month, for each planned release, for the whole operation solution life of the system (six years). Each screen of the GUI uses several third-party controls which are not compatible with the existing automation solutions. The environment for the automation will be stable, fully controllable and separated from other environments (development, staging, production).
What could be the MOST problematic for this TAS?

Maturity of the test process

Complexity to automate

Frequency ofuse

Sustainability of the automated environment

NEW QUESTION 32
Consider A TAS for testing a desktop application via its GUI. All the test cases of the automated test suite contain the same identical sequences of steps at the beginning (to create the necessary objects when doing a preliminary configuration of the test environment and at the end (to remove everything created -specifically for the test itself during the preliminary configuration of the test environment). All automated test cases use the same set of assertion functions from a shared library, for verifying the values in the GUI fields (e.g text boxes).
What is the BEST recommendation for improving the TAS?

Implementing keywords with higher level of granularity

Improving the architecture of the application in order to improve its testability

Adopting a set of standard verification methods for use by all automated tests

Implementing standard setup and teardown functions at test case level

NEW QUESTION 33
You have been asked to determine a TAS for a new release of a SUT,test should be automated wherever. The new release will consist of 5 new interfaces and an amendment to 3 existing interfaces. The new and amended interface will be deliver incrementally in 3 sprints, each lasting 2 weeks.
What would be the BEST Test Automation Solution (TAS) design in this scenario?

Automate tests at both Component and System Level. Only do this automation once every interface has been fully developed or amended and manual testing has completed successfully.

Automate tests at one level only, System level. Use only the newly developed interfaces and do not create any customized interfaces/test hooks.

Automate the tests at two levels, Component and System level. Create customized hooks at Component level for interface not yet developed or amended. Only use the newly developed or amended interfaces to test at System level.

Automate a test at once level, component level, Create customized interface/test hooks for this level where the interface has not yet been developed or amended.

NEW QUESTION 34
A defect in a SUT has been resolved and validated by an automated defect re-test in the current release of the software. This retest has now been addedto the automated regression test suite.
Which statement BEST describes a reason why this defect could re-occur in future releases?

Automated defect confirmation testing is not effective at confirming that the resolved defect will continue to work in future releases

The configuration management process does not properly control the synchronization between software archives

The automated regression test suite is not run consistently for future releases.

The automated regression test suite has a narrower scope of functionality

NEW QUESTION 35
You have been asked todeterminea TAS for a new release of a SUT, test should be automatedwherever. The new release will consist of 5 new interfaces and an amendment to 3 existing interfaces. The new and amended interface will be deliver incrementally in 3 sprints, each lasting 2 weeks.
What would be the BEST Test Automation Solution (TAS) design in this scenario?

Automate tests at both Component and System Level. Only do this automation once every interface has been fully developed or amended and manual testing has completed successfully.

Automate tests at one level only, System level. Use only the newly developed interfaces and do not create any customized interfaces/test hooks.

Automate a test at once level, component level, Create customized interface/test hooks for this level where the interface has not yet been developed or amended.

NEW QUESTION 36
Which of the following metrics could suggest, under certain condition that an automated regression test suite has NOT been updated for new functionalities added to the SUT?

The ratio of comments to executable statements in the SUT code.

The SUT code coverage provided by the execution of the regression test suite.

The defect density in the automation code of the regression test suite.

The ratio of commands to executable statements in the automation code of the regression test suite

NEW QUESTION 37
Which of the following statements BEST describe aspects of the SUT to consider when designing a TAA?

All the interaction between SUT and TAS should be logged with the highest level of detail

All the internal test interfaces of the SUT should be removed prior to the product release

All the interface of the SUT affected by the tests should be controllable by the TAA

All the external test interfaces of the SUT should be removed prior to the product release

NEW QUESTION 38
Which of the following attributes should NOT be included in a test execution report associated with a suite of automated tests?

Summary of the test execution results

System/Application under test and its version

Defect clusters identified during test execution

Environment in which the tests have been executed

NEW QUESTION 39
A SUT has an existing automated test suite.
Which of the following statements relating to the introduction of new features in the SUT is TRUE?

Automated tests are not affected by the introduction of a new feature and running them against the new SUT is a waste of effort

The introduction of a new feature could require updates or additions to the testware components

The test automation engineer should work with the business analysts to ensure the new feature is testable

It is generally more difficult to automate test cases for a new feature as the development has not yet started

NEW QUESTION 40
As a TAE you are evaluating a functional test automation tool that will be for several projects within your organization. The projects require that tool to work effectively and efficiently with SUT’s in distributed environments. The test automated tool also needs to interface with other existing test tools (test management tool and defect tracking tool.) The existing test tools subject to planned updates and their interface to the test automated tool may not work property after these updates.
Which of the following are the two LEAST important concerns related to the evaluation of the test automation in this scenario?
* Is the test automation tool able to launch processors and execute test cases on multiple machines in different environments?
* Does the test automation tool support a licensing scheme thatallows accessing different sets?
* Does the test automation tool have a large featureset, but only part of the features will be sets?
* Do the release notes for the planned updates on existing specify the impacts on their interfaces to other tools?
Does the test automation tool need to install specific libraries that could impact the SUT?

A and C

A and E

B and E

C and D